1997 Rover 414i vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 159 kg more than 2012 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Cube (172 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Rover 414i | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Rover | Nissan |
| Model | 414i | Cube |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1399 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1301 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2530 mm |
