1997 Saturn SL vs. 1969 ZAZ 966

To start off, 1997 Saturn SL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,899 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Saturn SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Saturn SL (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Saturn SL should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Saturn SL weights approximately 315 kg more than 1969 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Saturn SL (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1997 Saturn SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 ZAZ 966.

Compare all specifications: