1997 Saturn SL vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Saturn SL would be higher. At 2,433 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (137 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1997 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1997 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1997 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (285 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Saturn SL | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Saturn | Volvo |
Model | SL | S60 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 2433 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |