1997 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 1981 Suzuki Cervo

To start off, 1997 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 500 kg more than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1981 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Suzuki Cervo.

Compare all specifications: