1997 Skoda Felicia vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Skoda Felicia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Skoda Felicia would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1997 Skoda Felicia. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1997 Skoda Felicia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Skoda Felicia. (100 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Skoda Felicia.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Skoda Felicia | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Skoda | Holden |
Model | Felicia | Epica |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |