1997 Skoda Octavia vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1997 Skoda Octavia. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1997 Skoda Octavia.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Skoda Octavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Skoda Octavia. (173 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Skoda Octavia.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Skoda Octavia | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Skoda | Citroen |
Model | Octavia | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 173 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |