1997 Suzuki C2 vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 394 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (171 Nm). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Suzuki C2 | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
| Make | Suzuki | Suzuki |
| Model | C2 | Reno |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 284 Nm | 171 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 848 kg | 1242 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2610 mm |
