1997 Suzuki C2 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2009 Holden Cruze. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Suzuki C2 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Suzuki | Holden |
| Model | C2 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 284 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2685 mm |
