1997 Suzuki Sidekick vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Suzuki Sidekick would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Because 2006 Suzuki Reno is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (133 Nm). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Suzuki Sidekick | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
| Make | Suzuki | Suzuki |
| Model | Sidekick | Reno |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 55 L |
