1997 Suzuki Swift vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1997 Suzuki Swift is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1997 Suzuki Swift. (52 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1997 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 910 kg more than 1997 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Suzuki Swift | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Suzuki | Talbot |
Model | Swift | Baby |
Year Released | 1997 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 3130 mm |