1997 Toyota Celica vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 1997 Toyota Celica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Toyota Celica (154 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 1997 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Toyota Celica | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Celica | 66 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1762 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 154 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
