1997 Toyota Celica vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Volvo S40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S40 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1997 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo S40 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S40 (320 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Toyota Celica | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Celica | S40 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1762 cc | 2520 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |