1997 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Toyota Celica (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Toyota Celica | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Celica | Ka |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1762 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |