1997 Toyota Chaser vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Chaser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Chaser would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Chaser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo weights approximately 105 kg more than 1997 Toyota Chaser.
Because 1997 Toyota Chaser is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Toyota Chaser. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo has automatic transmission and 1997 Toyota Chaser has manual transmission. 1997 Toyota Chaser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Toyota Chaser | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo | |
Make | Toyota | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Chaser | Vaneo |
Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |