1997 Toyota Mega Cruiser vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Mega Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Mega Cruiser would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Mega Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Toyota Mega Cruiser weights approximately 929 kg more than 2012 Volvo XC60.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Toyota Mega Cruiser. (391 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Toyota Mega Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Toyota Mega Cruiser | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Mega Cruiser | XC60 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 391 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2850 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2290 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3400 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 108 L | 70 L |