1997 Toyota MR2 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1997 Toyota MR2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Toyota MR2 (173 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Toyota MR2 (186 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1997 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Toyota MR2 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | MR2 | 66 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |