1997 Vector M12 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Vector M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Vector M12 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1997 Vector M12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Vector M12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Vector M12 (576 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1997 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Vector M12 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Vector | Ford |
Model | M12 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5707 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 484 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2619 mm |