1997 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1997 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volkswagen Caddy (59 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volkswagen Caddy (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1997 Volkswagen Caddy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Volkswagen Caddy | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | Caddy | 66 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1389 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
