1997 Volvo C70 vs. 1970 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1997 Volvo C70 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo C70 (190 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Volvo C70 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1970 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volvo C70 (270 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1997 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300. 1997 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 1970 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1970 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: