1997 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1052 kg more than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 ZAZ Wagon | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | ZAZ | Jeep |
| Model | Wagon | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1091 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1797 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4161 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2423 mm |
