1997 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 518 kg more than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 ZAZ Wagon | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | ZAZ | Kia |
Model | Wagon | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 75.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1263 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2660 mm |