1997 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia RIO weights approximately 351 kg more than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 ZAZ Wagon | 2013 Kia RIO | |
| Make | ZAZ | Kia |
| Model | Wagon | RIO |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4850 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1096 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4045 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2570 mm |
