1998 Abarth Stola vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 Abarth Stola is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Stola (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1998 Abarth Stola.
Because 1998 Abarth Stola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Abarth Stola | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | Stola | 62 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1941 |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1610 mm |
