1998 Abarth Stola vs. 1962 AC Aceca

To start off, 1998 Abarth Stola is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Stola (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Abarth Stola weights approximately 9 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1998 Abarth Stola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Abarth Stola (345 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1998 Abarth Stola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Abarth Stola 1962 AC Aceca
Make Abarth AC
Model Stola Aceca
Year Released 1998 1962
Engine Size 1994 cc 2553 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type boxer in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 276 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 345 Nm 209 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 791 kg
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 4070 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1560 mm
Vehicle Height 1210 mm 1330 mm