1998 Abarth Stola vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1998 Abarth Stola is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Stola (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 520 kg more than 1998 Abarth Stola.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Abarth Stola (345 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1998 Abarth Stola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Abarth Stola | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Abarth | Nissan |
| Model | Stola | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1470 mm |
