1998 Abarth Stola vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Abarth Stola is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Abarth Stola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Stola (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (80 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault Clio weights approximately 50 kg more than 1998 Abarth Stola.
Because 1998 Abarth Stola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Abarth Stola (345 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (107 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Abarth Stola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Abarth Stola | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | Stola | Clio |
Year Released | 1998 | 1991 |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 107 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1410 mm |