1998 Abarth Stola vs. 2000 Alfa Romeo 156
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Abarth Stola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Abarth Stola would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Stola (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (134 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1998 Abarth Stola.
Because 1998 Abarth Stola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Abarth Stola (345 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (305 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1998 Abarth Stola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Abarth Stola | 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | |
Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Stola | 156 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2387 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1430 mm |