1998 Abarth Stola vs. 2000 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Abarth Stola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Abarth Stola would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Stola (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 975 kg more than 1998 Abarth Stola.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Abarth Stola. (345 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Abarth Stola.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Abarth Stola | 2000 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Abarth | GMC |
| Model | Stola | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1810 mm |
