1998 Abarth Stola vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Abarth Stola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Abarth Stola would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Stola (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1525 kg more than 1998 Abarth Stola.
Because 1998 Abarth Stola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Abarth Stola (345 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1998 Abarth Stola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Abarth Stola | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | Stola | Econoline |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 2060 mm |