1998 Abarth Stola vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Abarth Stola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Abarth Stola would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Stola (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (177 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 305 kg more than 1998 Abarth Stola.
Because 1998 Abarth Stola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Abarth Stola (345 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (191 Nm @ 5250 RPM). This means 1998 Abarth Stola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Abarth Stola | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | Stola | Clio |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1420 mm |