1998 Abarth Stola vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Abarth Stola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Abarth Stola would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Abarth Stola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Stola (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 1998 Abarth Stola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Stola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Abarth Stola (345 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Abarth Stola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Abarth Stola | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | Stola | Clio |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1650 mm |
