1998 AC Cobra vs. 1959 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 1998 AC Cobra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 614 kg more than 1998 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 AC Cobra | 1959 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cobra | Impala |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 3851 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 365 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3030 mm |
