1998 AC Cobra vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster

To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 AC Cobra (365 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (123 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 4 kg more than 1998 AC Cobra.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 AC Cobra (579 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1998 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Roadster.

Compare all specifications:

1998 AC Cobra 2003 Mazda Roadster
Make AC Mazda
Model Cobra Roadster
Year Released 1998 2003
Body Type Roadster Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 365 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 579 Nm 142 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 5000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1026 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 3960 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1210 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2270 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 48 L