1998 AC Cobra vs. 2006 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 AC Cobra (365 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2006 Ford Mustang. (210 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1830 kg more than 1998 AC Cobra.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 AC Cobra (579 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Mustang. (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications:

1998 AC Cobra 2006 Ford Mustang
Make AC Ford
Model Cobra Mustang
Year Released 1998 2006
Body Type Roadster Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 4013 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 365 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 579 Nm 325 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1026 kg 2856 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1210 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 61 L