1998 Acura CL vs. 2012 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2012 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura CL (200 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2012 Toyota RAV4. (179 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota RAV4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura CL weights approximately 22 kg more than 2012 Toyota RAV4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Acura CL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura CL | 2012 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Acura | Toyota |
| Model | CL | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1558 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4826 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1781 mm | 1854 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1389 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2715 mm | 2659 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
