1998 Acura EL vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 471 kg more than 1998 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (300 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura EL | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | EL | C-Max |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1079 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4478 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1704 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1394 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2788 mm |