1998 Acura Integra vs. 1951 Austin A 90
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 90. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 90 weights approximately 136 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra.
Because 1951 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Austin A 90 (190 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 1951 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1951 Austin A 90 | |
Make | Acura | Austin |
Model | Integra | A 90 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1835 cc | 2660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 190 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |