1998 Acura Integra vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,987 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (158 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1998 Acura Integra. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura Integra.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Acura | Maserati |
Model | Integra | A6G |
Year Released | 1998 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2290 mm |