1998 Acura Integra vs. 1961 Austin A 40
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (140 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura Integra (172 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1998 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1961 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Acura | Austin |
Model | Integra | A 40 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 36 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 68 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 64.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2220 mm |