1998 Acura Integra vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille

To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1998 Acura Integra. (170 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 766 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (582 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.

Compare all specifications: