1998 Acura Integra vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (140 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura Integra (172 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm). This means 1998 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1963 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Acura | Isuzu |
Model | Integra | Bellel |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 55 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 121 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |