1998 Acura Integra vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,835 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura Integra weights approximately 558 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Acura | Lotus |
Model | Integra | Elan |
Year Released | 1998 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1835 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 696 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |