1998 Acura Integra vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 108 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura Integra | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Acura | Mercury |
| Model | Integra | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1835 cc | 4728 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 129 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1362 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
