1998 Acura Integra vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,835 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura Integra weights approximately 594 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura Integra | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Acura | DAF |
| Model | Integra | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1835 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
