1998 Acura Integra vs. 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (140 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S. (112 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S.
Because 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura Integra (172 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S. (160 Nm). This means 1998 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S | |
Make | Acura | Fairthorpe |
Model | Integra | TX-S |
Year Released | 1998 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 112 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2110 mm |