1998 Acura Integra vs. 1969 Fiat Dino
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 2,418 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Fiat Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Fiat Dino (177 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1998 Acura Integra. (170 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Fiat Dino should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Fiat Dino weights approximately 150 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Fiat Dino (220 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 1969 Fiat Dino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura Integra | 1969 Fiat Dino | |
| Make | Acura | Fiat |
| Model | Integra | Dino |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1835 cc | 2418 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1404 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
