1998 Acura Integra vs. 1976 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1976 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1976 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 102 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra.
Because 1976 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura Integra (174 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm). This means 1998 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1976 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | Integra | Cedric |
Year Released | 1998 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1835 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 147 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1356 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |