1998 Acura Integra vs. 1978 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1978 Mercury Cougar. (133 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1978 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 601 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra.
Because 1978 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mercury Cougar (336 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 1978 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1978 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Acura | Mercury |
Model | Integra | Cougar |
Year Released | 1998 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1835 cc | 4941 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 133 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 336 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2010 mm |