1998 Acura Integra vs. 1979 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1979 Chevrolet Camaro. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1979 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 331 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Chevrolet Camaro (358 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 1979 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura Integra | 1979 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | Integra | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1835 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 358 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
