1998 Acura Integra vs. 1986 Fiat Croma
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura Integra weights approximately 74 kg more than 1986 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Croma (235 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 1986 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura Integra | 1986 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | Acura | Fiat |
| Model | Integra | Croma |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1835 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
